Current state against the requirement
The difference between the security you have and the security a framework asks for, stated as a difference rather than a score.
← All use cases GAP ANALYSIS
Identify the gaps before someone else does.
A clear, visual map of where you stand — your security compared against NIS2, ISO 27001 and GDPR, rather than asserted against them.
Ready-made frameworks
Predefined question sets for NIS2, CIS Controls and Microsoft Zero Trust. Nobody should start a gap analysis from an empty spreadsheet.
Prioritise correctly
Results become action plans, ordered by the measures that reduce the most risk — not the ones that are easiest to close.
A collaborative process
Security is a team effort. Questions are delegated to the person who can actually answer them, inside the organisation or at a subcontractor.
Recommendations, not just findings
Where a gap is found, an action suggestion comes with it, so the analysis ends with something to do rather than something to read.
Reduce the risk of sanctions
A proactive closing of gaps is the difference between a finding you fixed and a finding someone else made.
What comes out of it
From complicated spreadsheets to a picture of compliance you can show somebody.
Book a demoProve it. Don’t promise it.
Assess your AI readiness
Takes one workshop. Grounded in your real data.